By Laura Ernde
Daily Journal Staff Writer Consumers can't pre-emptively sue businesses to remove offensive fine print in service contracts, the California Supreme Court held Thursday. Only after a company tries to enforce a questionable provision, such as a mandatory arbitration clause or a large cancellation fee, can a customer challenge the term in court under the Consumer Legal Remedies Act. Meyer v. Sprint Spectrum, 2009 DJDAR 1452.
Daily Journal Staff Writer Consumers can't pre-emptively sue businesses to remove offensive fine print in service contracts, the California Supreme Court held Thursday. Only after a company tries to enforce a questionable provision, such as a mandatory arbitration clause or a large cancellation fee, can a customer challenge the term in court under the Consumer Legal Remedies Act. Meyer v. Sprint Spectrum, 2009 DJDAR 1452.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy
here.