This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Forum (Forum & Focus)

Jan. 24, 2009

When Precedent Goes Up in Smoke

Together, the state high court and the U.S. Supreme Court have issues a jumbled mess of rulings regarding the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act, writes Michael Willemsen. - Forum Column

FORUM COLUMN

By Michael Willemsen

In December 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Altria Group v. Good, its third fundamentally inconsistent decision construing the pre-emption provision in the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act. That provision states: "No requirement or prohibition based on smoking and health shall be imposed under State law with respect to the advertising or promotion of any cigarettes the packages of which a...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up