This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Focus (Forum & Focus)

Sep. 14, 2007

Motion Maze

Focus Column - By Paul D. Fogel and Sean O'Rourke - Rule 50(b) in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is esoteric but potentially fatal if an appellant doesn't understand it.

FOCUS COLUMN

By Paul D. Fogel and Sean O'Rourke

      Most bees won't bother you if they are left alone. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50's "(b)" is quite the opposite: If an appellant seeking judgment-as-a-matter-of-law ignores that rule, he or she likely will be met with a nasty sting.
      Although courts likely will continue to be flexible about what constitutes a sufficient pre-verdict motio...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up