It should surprise no one that on Oct. 2, the U.S. Tax Court ruled that renowned studio artist and art professor Susan Crile was engaging in the business of studio art. Crile v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2014-202. But this was a big loss for the Internal Revenue Service, which had argued that despite her notoriety, Crile's studio art was a hobby.
Crile is not alone. Since the early 2000s, taxpayers have brought at l...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In