This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Contracts

Oct. 25, 2014

Arbitration bill will have broader implications than claimed

Although portrayed as only affecting hate crime statutes, the Assembly Bill 2617's provisions will have much broader ramifications. By Jennifer Barrera, Katherine Pettibone and Chris Micheli


By Jennifer Barrera, Katherine Pettibone and Chris Micheli


Recently enacted Assembly Bill 2617 was opposed by the business community because this new law will limit the use of arbitration agreements in California by prohibiting mandatory, pre-dispute arbitration agreements in specified instances. Although portrayed as only affecting hate crime statutes, the bill's provisions will have much broader ramifications.


AB 2617 prohibits a person from requ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up