This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Focus (Forum & Focus)

Dec. 18, 2007

Justifying Summary Judgment

Focus Column - By David J. Ozeran - Summary adjudication is a murky area for courts and practitioners and will remain so until 'cause of action' can be defined more concretely.

FOCUS COLUMN

By David J. Ozeran

      California's summary-judgment statute permits a trial court to summarily adjudicate "one or more causes of action." Code of Civil Procedure Section 437c(f)(1). "A party is entitled to summary adjudication of a cause of action if there is no triable issue of material fact and the matter can be adjudicated as a question of law." London Market Insurers v. Superior Court, 146 Cal.App.4th 648 ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up