This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Constitutional Law

Mar. 30, 2016

Federal authority over navigable waters

A recent Supreme Court ruling prompted a knee-jerk proclamation of victory by some hoping to ultimately curtail the federal government's ability to control what happens on rivers, streams and other waters on public land, including national parks. By Miyoko Sakashita

Miyoko Sakashita

See more...

By Miyoko Sakashita

The U.S. Supreme Court's recent ruling in Sturgeon v. Frost, 2016 DJDAR 2754 (March 22, 2016), prompted a knee-jerk proclamation of victory by some hoping to ultimately curtail the federal government's ability to control what happens on rivers, streams and other waters on public land, including national parks.

But while the Supreme Court vacated the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' ruling that the National Park...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up