This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Law Practice

Mar. 2, 2016

Must we interpret everything said in a courtroom?

To say that "interpreting everything that's being said" is an "established interpreting standard" is quite a stretch, to say the least. By Hiram Torres

Hiram Torres

Interpreter
Alameda County Superior Court

Hiram is a state and federally certified court interpreter and a former member of the Judicial Council's Court Interpreters Advisory Panel.

See more...

By Hiram Torres

An email from the California Federation of Interpreters (CFI) sent last October asked its members, myself included, to report certain "language access incidents," among them: "Violations of established interpreting standards, such as not providing team interpreting or prohibiting interpreters from interpreting everything that's being said." (Emphasis added.) Since defendants and relatives of minors cannot "prohibit" anythi...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up