This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Supreme Court,
Securities

Feb. 27, 2016

Personal benefit and insider trading

The Supreme Court recently announced that it will hear U.S. v. Salman, a case that will affect scores of pending insider trading cases.

Angela Machala

Partner
Scheper Kim & Harris LLP

See more...

The U.S. Supreme Court's recent announcement that it will hear the case of U.S. v. Salman, 792 F.3d 1087 (9th Cir. 2015), has many in the white collar criminal defense bar wondering where the court will land on the issue of what kind of "personal benefit" a corporate insider (or "tipper") must receive in order to be liable for insider trading. Will the court side with the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' decision in U.S. v. Newman, 773 F.3d 438 (2d Cir. 2014), establish...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up