This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Constitutional Law

Feb. 25, 2016

Apple dispute shows bill is bogus

Apple's ongoing showdown with the Justice Department over an iPhone is raising much-needed public awareness of the role of encryption in the devices and services we use.

Andrew Crocker

Staff Attorney
Electronic Frontier Foundation

See more...

Apple's ongoing showdown with the Justice Department over an iPhone is raising much-needed public awareness of the role of encryption in the devices and services we use. There's an important legal precedent at stake in Apple's court fight - whether private companies can be forced to write code undermining key security features in specific cases. But a new California bill would take an even more drastic approach, regulating the encryption features of all smartphones.

Assembly Bill 168...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up