A couple of weeks ago I moderated a lively debate about the first sale doctrine and "gray-market" goods at the USC IP Institute in Beverly Hills. The debate centered on the case of Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., No. 11-697, then pending before the U.S. Supreme Court, and whether the petitioner, Supap Kirtsaeng, was liable for copyright infringement for reselling in the U.S. textbooks published by Wiley that were fi...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In