This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Ethics/Professional Responsibility

Apr. 5, 2013

Can a large punitive damages award insulate lawyers from malpractice claims?

With the law unclear on whether punitive damages awarded in an underlying case can offset any alleged damages in a later malpractice case, an analysis of the judicial and public policies behind an award of punitive damages is sure to become essential. By Alyson Decker


By Alyson Decker


Under California law, a client who sues their former attorney for legal malpractice cannot recover punitive damages that were allegedly lost because of that attorney's negligence in the underlying case. See Ferguson v. Leiff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, 30 Cal. 4th 1037 (2003); Piscitelli v. Friedenberg, 87 Cal App. 4th 953 (2001). While the Ferguson rule is undisputed, there is a dearth of case law regarding ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up