By Yuval Miller and M. Anderson Berry
Imagine that two companies, based in Connecticut and Japan, are negotiating an international trade agreement. If international arbitration becomes necessary to resolve a dispute under the agreement, they expect to use their trusted outside counsel, respectively based in New York and Tokyo. Although the Japanese attorneys have participated in New York arbitrations, they are wary of arbitrating in the Connecticut company's preferred ven...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In