This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Jan. 8, 2010

Support Payments, It's a Question of Time

Family law attorneys Mitchell Jacobs and Jami Fosgate examine In re Marriage of Kacik and the issue of spousal and child support payments.

By Mitchell Jacobs and Jami Fosgate

In re Marriage of Kacik 2009 DJDAR 16365 is a case of first impression in which the Court of Appeal analyzed "How much time can elapse before is becomes was?" when deciding whether a supported party must make the showing of a 'change of circumstances' in order to obtain an increase in spousal support payments once child support payments terminate.

Although the Court of Appeal does not answer the question ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up