Labor/Employment
Dec. 22, 2009
Not So Restrictive Covenants?
Janie Schulman of Morrison & Foerster examines the future of employee mobility in the aftermath of Edwards v. Arthur Andersen.
By Janie Schulman
Every so often, we must come to grips with a major paradigm shift. When Christopher Columbus failed to sail off the edge of the Earth, many skeptics had to concede that the world really isn't flat. Advocates for employee mobility also see a paradigm shift: a message from California courts that despite the most creative drafting, employers may not use non-competition agreements or other restrictive covenants to prohibit former employees from working for c...For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In