This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Dec. 22, 2009

Compulsory Copenhagen

Tessa Schwartz and Sarah Niyogi of Morrison & Foerster say the need for clean technology transfer cannot be suspended.

By Tessa Schwartz and Sarah Niyogi

Climate change talks in Copenhagen have fractured. A binding agreement on climate change is nowhere in sight. Even so, world leaders have reached consensus on one thing - the adoption of clean technologies in developed and developing countries is imperative to mitigate climate change. The method to best facilitate technology transfer, however, has been the subject of intense debate at the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Ch...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up