This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Supreme Court

Dec. 16, 2009

Supreme Court to Review Text Messages in Employee Privacy Case

A swat officer claimed he had an expectation of privacy that would prevent the city from retrieving sexually explicit texts he sent to his wife and mistress and others.

By Lawrence Hurley

Daily Journal Staff Writer

WASHINGTON - Delving into the limits of employee privacy, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed Monday to review whether an Ontario police officer had a right to privacy when he sent sexually explicit text messages on a government-issued pager.

The city of Ontario and its police department sought review of a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling in favor of the employees. Ontario v. Q...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up