By Michael Cypers and Joshua Stokes
When the California Supreme Court decided In re Tobacco II Cases, 46 Cal. 4th 298 (2009), you could hear the sound of champagne corks popping in plaintiff firms all across California hoping to obtain certification of large classes containing plaintiffs who did not even have to show they were exposed to or relied upon the allegedly unfair or fraudulent representations in order recover under the Unfair Competition Law (UCL), Califo...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In