By John Roemer
Daily Journal Staff Writer
A Riverside County judge was wrong to allow TV coverage of a court hearing to decide whether a three-time rapist should remain incarcerated in a state hospital, a state appellate panel held Thursday.
The unanimous published opinion took a hard look at how to balance defendants' rights against the public's wish to see court proceedings televised. ...
Daily Journal Staff Writer
A Riverside County judge was wrong to allow TV coverage of a court hearing to decide whether a three-time rapist should remain incarcerated in a state hospital, a state appellate panel held Thursday.
The unanimous published opinion took a hard look at how to balance defendants' rights against the public's wish to see court proceedings televised. ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In