This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Focus (Forum & Focus)

Aug. 15, 2008

Ignoring Federal Rule 37(c) Can Cause an Uphill Legal Battle

Sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 37(c) can devastate a litigant’s claims or defenses, write Rex S. Heinke and Katharine J. Galston. - Forum Column

FORUM COLUMN

By Rex S. Heinke and Katharine J. Galston
This article appears on Page 6

      A litigant's failure to comply with a district court's pretrial disclosure schedule can lead to very harsh consequences. Missing a deadline can effectively end the case as a result of the sanctioning power of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(c). Rule 37(c) mandates the preclusion of evidence not properly disclosed in discover...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up