This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation

Oct. 14, 2000

Moving Along

Since the California Legislature amended Code of Civil Procedure Section 437c in 1990, California courts have grappled with the issue of whether summary adjudication is appropriate where the resolution of an issue of duty does not completely dispose of a cause of action.

By Gregg S. Garfinkel
        Since the California Legislature amended Code of Civil Procedure Section 437c in 1990, California courts have grappled with the issue of whether summary adjudication is appropriate where the resolution of an issue of duty does not completely dispose of a cause of action.
        Conflicting interpretations of this section suggest that...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up