This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Aug. 26, 2015

Joinder in patent processes: same facts, different results

Since the inception of the inter-partes review and covered business method processes in 2011, the Patent Trial and Appeals Board has seen a wave of petitions regarding the same patent. By Harper Batts


By Harper Batts


Since the inception of the inter-partes review (IPR) and covered business method (CBM)
processes in 2011, the Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB) has seen a considerable
growth in the number of petitions regarding the same patent. This has occurred when
multiple IPRs have been filed by the same petitioner, or with multiple petitioners
filing IPRs on the same patent. When petitions for t...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up