This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

GC Email

Jul. 17, 2015

Recent decision will affect strategy to protect marks

Registration proceedings before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board are become more hotly contested due to a recent Supreme Court decision. By Rosalyn Chapman


By Rosalyn Chapman


More than 12 years ago, based upon a prior Trademark Trial Appeal Board (TTAB) decision
finding a "likelihood of confusion," I applied the principle of collateral estoppel
to preclude the defendant in a trademark infringement action from re-litigating whether
the use of its trade name resulted in a "likelihood of confusion" with the plaintiff's
registered tradem...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up