By Jeffrey K. Winikow
To many, the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Circuit City Stores Inc. v. Adams, 2001 DJDAR 2849 (U.S. March 21, 2001), is a sweeping endorsement of private arbitration; to others, the decision represents nothing but judicial tolerance for a "separate but equal" system of civil rights enforcement, in which those charged with violating the ...
To many, the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Circuit City Stores Inc. v. Adams, 2001 DJDAR 2849 (U.S. March 21, 2001), is a sweeping endorsement of private arbitration; to others, the decision represents nothing but judicial tolerance for a "separate but equal" system of civil rights enforcement, in which those charged with violating the ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In




