This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Constitutional Law

Apr. 10, 2001

Protesting Drug Testing

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled recently that a hospital's drug testing of pregnant women at the direction of the police and the prosecution constitutes an unconstitutional search of nonconsenting pregnant women. The case has aroused strong feelings among both supporters and opponents of the testing policy because it affected patient confidentiality and touched on questions of racial and sexual discrimination, as well as the legal status of fetal life.

        By Jeffrey A. Lowe
        
        The U.S. Supreme Court ruled recently that a hospital's drug testing of pregnant women at the direction of the police and the prosecution constitutes an unconstitutional search of nonconsenting pregnant women. The case has aroused strong feelings among both supporters and opponents of the testing...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up