This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Civil Rights

May 29, 2009

Cell Phone 'Choice of Law' Clause Unlawful, Judge Finds

A U.S. judge ruled Tuesday that the "choice of law" provision - a clause many cell phone and credit card companies include in their contracts that creates an obstacle for class action lawsuits - is unlawful, potentially opening the door for other courts to rule in favor of consumers trying to file class actions against corporations.

By Catherine Ho
Daily Journal Staff Writer

A U.S. judge ruled Tuesday that the "choice of law" provision - a clause many cell phone and credit card companies include in their contracts that creates an obstacle for class action lawsuits - is unlawful, potentially opening the door for other courts to rule in favor of consumers trying to file class actions against corporations.

The ruling, by U.S. District Judge Ricardo Martinez in Seattle, also str...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up