This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

May 28, 2009

Current Fraud Rules Don't Leave Much Wiggle Room

Recent decisions by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board have been criticized as eschewing the traditional "fraud" analysis, write Jessica Bromall and Rod Berman.

By Jessica Bromall and Rod Berman

At common law, the following elements must be shown to prove fraud: the false representation of a material fact; knowledge of falsity; the intention to induce reliance; actual and reasonable reliance and resulting damage. The Federal Circuit has held that a federal trademark registration should be invalidated for fraud only "when an applicant knowingly makes false, material representations of fact in connection with...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up