By Craig Anderson
Daily Journal Staff Writer SAN JOSE - In a victory for high-tech worker rights, a federal judge has ruled that a clause in a semiconductor equipment company's employment contract allowing it to assert ownership over a former employee's invention is invalid and unenforceable. U.S. District Judge James Ware issued the ruling late Wednesday in a dispute between San Jose-based Applied Materials Inc. and a small company started by for...
Daily Journal Staff Writer SAN JOSE - In a victory for high-tech worker rights, a federal judge has ruled that a clause in a semiconductor equipment company's employment contract allowing it to assert ownership over a former employee's invention is invalid and unenforceable. U.S. District Judge James Ware issued the ruling late Wednesday in a dispute between San Jose-based Applied Materials Inc. and a small company started by for...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In