This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

May 21, 2009

Ruling Softens the Blow on Fraud Findings in Trademark Applications

Counsel should carefully monitor a client's trademark portfolio to ensure that no misstatements were made to the Patent and Trademark Office, write Robert C. Weiss and Anna E. Raimer.

By Robert C. Weiss and Anna E. Raimer

The issue of fraud on the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has received much attention from trademark practitioners since the Medinol decision by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, holding that fraud in the procurement of a trademark registration causes the entire resulting registration to be void. Medinol Ltd. v. Neuro Vasx Inc., 67 U.S.P.Q.2d 1205 (TTAB 2003). The board has now softened the blow by holdin...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up