This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Focus (Forum & Focus)

May 8, 2009

The Clause Come Out

Procedural and substantive unconscionability must be present to justify the refusal to enforce a contract or clause based on unconscionability, writes Steven G. Mehta.

By Steven G. Mehta

Two recent cases have shed light on the issue of arbitration clauses and how they can be enforced. Both cases have addressed the issue of procedural and substantive unconscionability. Both cases have also addressed the issue in the context of employment and labor claims. The cases reaffirm the principle that there must be both substantive and procedural unconscionability for an arbitration agreement to be unenforceable.

The California Arbitra...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up