This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Focus (Forum & Focus)

May 6, 2009

State of Confusion

The rules of diversity jurisdiction and corporate citizenship are complicated, especially when litigating in California federal courts, write Joanne Caruso and Carolyn Woodson.

FOCUS COLUMN

By Joanne Caruso and Carolyn Woodson

In law school, we were all taught a deceptively simple rule for purposes of determining whether diversity jurisdiction exists: A corporation has dual citizenship and is a citizen of both the state of its incorporation and the state of its principal place of business. But the rules of diversity jurisdiction and corporate citizenship are, in fact, not that simple, especially when litigating in Calif...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up