This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation

Mar. 23, 2012

Sweetener wars lead to sticky issues

Attorneys for the Cargill Inc. and Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. argued they should not be liable for a national ad campaign about the health benefits of high fructose corn syrup that sugar producers allege is misleading.


By Gabe Friedman


Daily Journal Staff Writer


LOS ANGELES - The battle playing out in federal court between corn and sugar producers over the health effects of high-fructose corn syrup could turn into a cold war.


The sugar producers allege a national radio and television advertising campaign portraying high-fructose corn syrup as a natural equivalent to table sugar amounts to false advertising. The corn industry has countered that its ads are ac...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up