This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Jan. 7, 2014

Mandatory minimum history cherry picked

Re: "History Ignored by Sentencing Law Critics," Dec. 24. By Kenneth G. Petrulis

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR COLUMN

Professor William G. Otis' attempt to use history to support his argument for mandatory sentences fails. ["History Ignored by Sentencing Law Critics," Dec. 24, 2013]. Indeterminate sentencing has been around since the end of the 19th century. Otis chose 1960 to begin his analysis, not because of any change in the sentencing laws, but rather because it was then that national crimes statistics first began to be collected. A revie...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up