This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Securities

Dec. 20, 2013

Day of reckoning for securities class actions

After years of growing attacks, the efficient-market hypothesis, along with the fraud-on-the-market theory, is now on the chopping block. By Christina Lincoln


By Christina Lincoln


After serving as the "cornerstone for modern private securities litigation" for 25 years, the "most powerful engine of civil liability ever established in American law" is now under fire at the U.S. Supreme Court.


Known as the Basic presumption, the fraud-on-the-market theory allows plaintiff lawyers to certify a securities class action for fraudulent misrepresentations under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up