This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit

Dec. 19, 2013

Arbitrator fees can be appealed even if clause says otherwise, 9th Circuit rules

Non-appealability clauses in arbitration agreements are unenforceable when they seek to insulate an arbitrator's fee allocation from judicial review, an appellate panel ruled.


By John Roemer


Daily Journal Staff Writer


Attorney wrangling over a $28 million fee award in a Wal-Mart Stores Inc. wage and hour class action settlement led to a decision Tuesday by a federal appellate panel on non-appealability clauses in arbitration agreements.


The upshot in a ruling of first impression by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals was that such clauses are unenforceable when they seek to insulate an arbitrator's fee allocat...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up