This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Judges and Judiciary

Dec. 17, 2013

Judicial ethics group opines on campaign contributions, appeals without court reporters

A judge should seriously consider recusal from a case involving a law firm whose lawyers gave more than $1,500 to the judge's election campaign, according to one of a pair of new opinions from a judicial ethics panel.


By Don J. DeBenedictis


Daily Journal Staff Writer


A judge should seriously consider recusal from a case involving a law firm whose lawyers gave more than $1,500 to the judge's election campaign, according to one of a pair of new opinions from a judicial ethics panel.


A recent statute requires judges to quit cases in which "a lawyer in the proceeding" has given more than that amount. Last week's opinion by the state Supreme Co...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up