This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

Perspective

Dec. 11, 2013

Trademark tacking surprise

It is notable that the 9th Circuit found an "exceptional" case for applying the tacking doctrine in a recent case. By James Hardin


By James Hardin


Trademark ownership is based on priority of use - the first to actually use a trademark or trade dress (generally, "mark") in commerce has rights to it. The "tacking" doctrine - which allows someone who has updated or subtly refined a mark over time or received a valid assignment of rights in a mark from an earlier user, to "tack" onto the date of the earliest use to establish priority - is integral to this system. Bu...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up