This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation

Dec. 10, 2013

Judge appears skeptical of plaintiffs' claims in lithium ion battery litigation

But U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers also refuted defendants' arguments the case should be significantly narrowed because two of the companies have already pleaded guilty to criminal charges of conspiracy.


By Hadley Robinson


Daily Journal Staff Writer


OAKLAND - A federal judge Friday expressed skepticism about whether plaintiffs who directly purchased lithium ion batteries have standing to bring a price-fixing class action against a group of electronics manufacturers. But in a hearing evaluating defendants' motion to dismiss the claims, U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers also refuted arguments the case should be significantly narrowed, given t...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up