This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Ethics/Professional Responsibility

Apr. 15, 2015

Forced to argue unpopular positions?

A recent New York Times report found that big firms are refusing to accept cases where they would have to argue that marriage can only occur between a man and a woman. By Paul Karl Lukacs


By Paul Karl Lukacs


If California lawyers believe that even the most heinous and unpopular clients deserve vigorous representation, then the State Bar should consider forcing members to accept such cases. That's the rule in several common law countries - a rule we should consider implementing here.


The legal world is abuzz over the New York Times' report over the weekend that large firms are refusing to accept cases where they would have to argu...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up