This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit

Apr. 14, 2015

9th Circuit revives suit alleging products labeled "natural" were anything but

Appellate panel rules that consumers' case against cosmetics maker should be put on hold, not dismissed, while awaiting guidance from the FDA on what "natural" means.


By Fiona Smith


Daily Journal Staff Writer


A federal appellate court has revived a proposed class action lawsuit filed by consumers who claim they were cheated into buying cosmetics labeled "natural," but which were full of synthetic chemicals.


On Friday, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the plaintiffs may bring claims that such labeling is false or misleading under state law, but also held that the lawsuit should be ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up