This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Apr. 8, 2015

Income loss doesn't always justify reduced support

A court may reduce child support obligations if there is a loss of income, but not when a party's intentional conduct is to blame. By Mitchell A. Jacobs and Lauri Kritt Martin


By Mitchell A. Jacobs and Lauri Kritt Martin


In In re Marriage of McHugh, 2014 DJDAR 15841 (Cal. App. 4th Dist. Nov. 26, 2014), the trial court's imputation of income from former employment was upheld after finding Mr. McHugh (Charles) engaged in deliberate misconduct, which he compounded by refusing to provide restitution, disclose his misconduct and enter into a "last chance" employment agreement, leading to his loss of employment.

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up