This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Apr. 3, 2015

Pot laws versus the supremacy clause

Colorado's neighboring states, Nebraska and Oklahoma, have invoked the high court's original and exclusive jurisdiction to hear legal disputes between states over marijuana laws. By Robert C. Bonner


By Robert C. Bonner


When the voters of Colorado adopted Amendment 64 legalizing and licensing the sale of marijuana, they put Colorado on a collision course with federal law, which makes these acts illegal. The issue of which law prevails has been squarely put before the U.S. Supreme Court by Colorado's neighboring states, Nebraska and Oklahoma, who have invoked the high court's original and exclusive jurisdiction to hear legal disputes between states. <...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up