This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Criminal

Aug. 4, 2006

Judicial Panel Reassigns Case After Judges Disagree on Who Should Hear It

LOS ANGELES - In a rare move, a committee of federal judges has reassigned a criminal case after two judges disagreed over who should hear the matter.

By John Hanusz
      Daily Journal Staff Writer
      LOS ANGELES - In a rare move, a committee of federal judges has reassigned a criminal case after two judges disagreed over who should hear the matter.
      At issue is the bankruptcy-fraud and money-laundering case of civil rights attorney Stephen Yagman. Although the case originally was assigned to U.S. District Judge Stephen...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up