This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Supreme Court

Jun. 27, 2015

Prosecuting child abusers just got easier

The U.S. high court just made it easier to prosecute child abusers by retreating a bit from the court's stringent confrontation clause standards. By Joan S. Meier


By Joan S. Meier


Last week, in Ohio v. Clark, the U.S. high court both helped ensure child abusers may be successfully prosecuted
and laid to rest several questions about the scope of a defendant's right to confront
the witnesses against him. The decision also speeds the court's retreat from the stringent
standard Justice Antonin Scalia sought to ordain in Crawford v Washington (2004).

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up