This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Sep. 22, 2011

Must insurers pay in full after the insured wins the coverage fight?

Dealing with insurers who boldly refuse to pay defense costs based solely on the bill's format. By Joan M. Cotkin of Nossaman LLP


By Joan M. Cotkin


When can an insurer employ a "fee auditor" to justify paying less than the full amount of the covered defense fees? Probably only when the insurer is otherwise defending. Can insurers refuse to defend and still nickel and dime the bills with their favorite fee auditor? Probably not. The ancient case of Gray v. Zurich Ins. Co., 65 Cal. 2d 263 (1966), which is based on the even older case of Arenson v. National Auto Cas. Co.

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up