When can an insurer employ a "fee auditor" to justify paying less than the full amount of the covered defense fees? Probably only when the insurer is otherwise defending. Can insurers refuse to defend and still nickel and dime the bills with their favorite fee auditor? Probably not. The ancient case of Gray v. Zurich Ins. Co., 65 Cal. 2d 263 (1966), which is based on the even older case of Arenson v. National Auto Cas. Co.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy
here.