Last term, the U.S. Supreme Court unfurled the welcome mat to more plaintiffs seeking relief under the false advertising protections of the Lanham Act. But while the Supreme Court was expanding false advertising access to the Lanham Act, the circuit courts were busy making plaintiffs prove up their so-called irreparable injuries. What happened?
Let's start with the two Lanham Act false advertising cases: Pom Wonderful LLC v. Coc...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In