By Jessica Weisel and Gary M. McLaughlin
From the outset, Kirby v. Immoos Fire Protection Inc. (2012) Case No. S185827, presented a dilemma for the California Supreme Court. If it followed its holding in Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc. (2007) 40 Cal.4th 1094, employers that successfully defended against suits for meal-and-rest-break violations under Labor Code Section 226.7 could obtain attorney fees under Section 218.5. This wou...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In