This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation

May 4, 2012

California courts should revisit medical causation after Roberti

Roberti has helped make California a perfect haven for scientifically questionable personal injury cases. By Catherine Morris Krow of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP


By Catherine Morris Krow


"But what about Roberti ... ?" Every California defense lawyer who deals with medical causation will face this question at some point in his or her career. The reference is to Roberti v. Andy's Termite & Pest Control, a 2003 Court of Appeals decision that opened the door to speculative medical causation opinions in this state.

Roberti constitutes a double-whammy for defense lawyers fig...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up