This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Apr. 25, 2012

How safe is safe? YouTube decision limits the reach of the DMCA’s 'Safe Harbor'

Rather than following precedent providing a "safe harbor" for service providers as a matter of statutory construction, the 2nd circuit adopted a fact-based approach. By Carole Handler and John Shaeffer of Lathrop & Gage LLP


By Carole Handler and John Shaeffer


The 2nd Circuit's recent YouTube decision (Viacom International Inc., et al. v. YouTube Inc., et al. and related cases) is most notable for a subtle shift in perspective. Rather than following recent decisions that favor the service provider by applying to it as a matter of statutory construction the safe harbor provision of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, the Court of Appeals adopted a more fact-based p...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up