This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation

Apr. 2, 2014

Lockheed didn't intentionally lowball contract bid, jury says

Former employee Nyle Hooper filed a False Claims Act suit alleging the defense contractor intentionally underbid on a contract for space launch software by more than $400 million.


By Sarah Parvini


Daily Journal Staff Writer


A Los Angeles jury has found that Lockheed Martin Corp. did not deliberately and fraudulently lowball its bid for a U.S. Air Force contract by more than $400 million, ending for now a nine-year legal battle that stretched from Maryland to California.


Nyle Hooper, a whistleblower, or qui tam plaintiff in the case, filed a False Claims Act suit alleging the company intentionally underbid on $900 milli...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up